
Strangely, I was talking about it to a friend last week who likes philosophy (more than me I think). We both confessed to abandoning B&N before the end. Well before the end. I am sure it is a classic and worth the effort if you can stick it out, but I just wasn't understanding enough and it was a case of rapidly diminishing returns. I never got to "Being and Doing: Freedom", much less "Doing and Having".
What I remember liking is the idea that there is a void, a nothingness at the core of existence. But I can get this a little easier from the Heart Sutra or the Buddhist idea that every 'thing' has a lack of inherent existence, 'emptiness' in some translations (without falling into the trap of nihilism).
So, if I ever feel the need, I will find an idiot's guide to Sartre and settle for that. In good faith of course.
What I remember liking is the idea that there is a void, a nothingness at the core of existence. But I can get this a little easier from the Heart Sutra or the Buddhist idea that every 'thing' has a lack of inherent existence, 'emptiness' in some translations (without falling into the trap of nihilism).
So, if I ever feel the need, I will find an idiot's guide to Sartre and settle for that. In good faith of course.
